points by smallmancontrov 4 days ago | 0 comments
Yes, but DeepSeek went absolute goblin-mode on optimization and I would not be shocked to discover that OpenAI and Anthropic were behind on that front.
[–] 332451b 4 days ago
Yes, I would not be shocked either.
Sonnet 5.5 is 16x more expensive at $10 per million output tokens. Kimi K3.1 is also $10 per million output tokens, and its number of active parameters is only 6.5x larger than V4.1 Flash (104B compared to 16B). These things are not directly comparable of course, but just to give an idea.
Even if inference of those models needs 16x, 32x, or 48x the number of GPUs compared to V4.1 Flash, still seems like potentially great revenue per GPU.
[–] eeedda 4 days ago
My friend you are looking at the wrong number.
Its cash flows to the GPU that matter. Not revenue.
[–] Gareth321 4 days ago
They published all/most of their work and it would be unbelievable if Anthropic had not already used that research in their own architecture.
[–] cactusplant7374 4 days ago
What is the TPS of DeepSeek? All of the LLMs I have tried are slow as molasses. \
[–] micw 4 days ago
I use TensorX (EU hosted) and get 330TPS
[–] selectodude 4 days ago
I pretty reliably get 200 tokens per second on deep infra.
[–] kristianp 2 days ago
Deepinfra has a "contact sales" link. I assume personal accounts aren't available.
[–] Art9681 4 days ago
[–] smallmancontrov 3 days ago