Hacker News
points by aliasxneo 4 days ago | 0 comments
Being non-partisan or independent has nothing to do with being in the "exact middle." I don't even think that's a real thing, nor did I ever imply it was. A better example is that, given an election ballot, I might split party lines rather than toe it unconditionally. I register as neither party because I generally disagree enough I don't wish to be affiliated with their policies. It doesn't mean I don't agree with some. Perhaps one election cycle I swing more left than right and the next I swing more right than left. It doesn't mean one cycle I identify as a Democrat and the other a Republican.

Since you keep baiting me with your straw man, I'll address the example: I neither want to torture immigrants nor do I want to give free healthcare to non-taxpayers. So, given your straw man, that would posit I'm in neither party's camp.

[–] cowlevel 4 days ago
This is not the definition of non-partisan.
[–] aliasxneo 4 days ago
"Nonpartisan means free from party affiliation, bias, or political party alignment."

You're not even being genuine at this point.

[–] cowlevel 3 days ago
Do you find yourself aligning with one party more than the other or is it an exact 50/50 split?
[–] aliasxneo 3 days ago
It's never a 50/50 split, and thus far it has yet to stay consistent with the tumultuous election cycles we've seen recently. I answered your straw man, which you ignored. Perhaps you can instruct me on what my true party affiliation is based on my answer to it? That might clear things up.
[–] cowlevel 3 days ago
Which party does the split favour?
[–] aliasxneo 3 days ago
Amazing that you continue to ignore the strawman, lol. Clearly you're trolling.