[–] echoangle 4 days ago
[–] Pirut 3 days ago
[–] robot_jesus 3 days ago
[–] Pirut 3 days ago
[–] adrian_b 3 days ago
I consider the third option worse, because it is better to choose the right map for your application than a map that is not optimal for any application.
Mercator is an angle-preserving map, so it is appropriate for navigation, but not for giving you a global view of the Earth, for which an area-preserving map is more useful.
Because I do not know the purpose of your map, I cannot judge whether Mercator is a good choice or not, but Mercator and similar navigation maps are seldom useful today, when navigation should be planned by computers, not with ruler and compass on a physical map.
[–] chronial 3 days ago
[–] busssard 4 days ago
A world for anyone. should have more than enough are. it would be interesting to see if wars and terretorial conflicts arise here as well
[–] Pirut 3 days ago
[–] Pirut 3 days ago
[–] throwaway219450 3 days ago
> Every mountain stands at its real height
> The Matterhorn is exactly as tall and as steep as the real one.
The models are RLd so hard to declare their own legitimacy. Everything has to be correct, genuine or real, no x, y or z.
[–] vidarh 4 days ago
[–] Pirut 3 days ago