points by mkremins 3 days ago | 0 comments
It’s always funny to read general-public takes on academic peer review, because they almost always betray a complete misunderstanding of how peer review works. Academic reviewers for the vast majority of journals notoriously do not get paid; in fact, paying peer reviewers is one of the most frequently suggested approaches to peer review reform.
The logic stands. A reviewer, even those who get zero compensation, can always review publicly published papers just like others.