Hacker News
points by mkremins 3 days ago | 0 comments
It’s always funny to read general-public takes on academic peer review, because they almost always betray a complete misunderstanding of how peer review works. Academic reviewers for the vast majority of journals notoriously do not get paid; in fact, paying peer reviewers is one of the most frequently suggested approaches to peer review reform.
[–] elendilm 3 days ago
Most still get benefits. I concede that many don't get "direct" remuneration. Some journals do pay. But many do get vouchers, discounts, free access, early access, etc. which amounts to a form of payment and thus compensated in kind. This effectively is "paid" as far as I am concerned.

The logic stands. A reviewer, even those who get zero compensation, can always review publicly published papers just like others.

Hacker News