Hacker News

points by lionkor 3 days ago | 0 comments

Not today, but tomorrow maybe, Claude could prevent you from implementing anything that looks or smells like a competitor product, for example.

You think they wouldn't?

[–] wongarsu 3 days ago

Developing a competing AI model with Claude is already against their TOS, and there was a period where they silently degraded quality if they thought that's how you are using Fable. People were not amused and presumably Anthropic currently does not sabotage your attempts, apart from regular TOS enforcement

[–] novaRom 3 days ago

Can this company ever be trusted?

Claude Fable 5's model card disclosed safeguards that would invisibly degrade output for requests linked to frontier LLM development. The research community called it "sabotage". Dean Ball: "degrading performance on ML research without telling the user is shockingly hostile" — including because it would corrupt third-party safety evaluators of Anthropic's own models.

[–] nextaccountic 3 days ago

They already put limits on machine learning research, with explicit intent to sabotage competitors

[–] swiftcoder 3 days ago

Lucky we have Kimi Pro then