the author, I imagine, would object that the bridge should have specified that it is not supposed to collapse.

And if it did, that the specific load that made it collapse should have been specifically mentioned in the spec.

And if it was, well just wait until agents become the magical machine gods he assumes they are, then bridge collapses will be a thing of the past.

but let's be real, he and everyone else are machine generating their specs anyway, and the relevant spec didnt mention anything about bridges collapsing but instead 250 pages of llm waffling about the tensile strength of different structural materials, load patterns from different tyre treads, the effect of climate change on el nino and weather patterns for wind, and the bridge still fell down, because nobody had any idea what they were doing