points by ulimn 3 days ago | 0 comments
I somewhat agree to what you said, but also, the whole point of agentic coding is that "code is cheap". So I can't imaging companies like Google not having the resources (whether human or token) to build a better agentic assistant/harness than what Anthropic can. I mean Google has a pretty good starting point with Google Docs, etc.
[–] port11 3 days ago
Google’s issue (and many large companies’?) is organisational. Google has famously launched a bunch of products to compete in multiple markets, only to sunset these products soon after.
[–] feistypharit 3 days ago
Everybody, everywhere pretty much always underestimates maintenance. And AI sucks at maintenance. It’ll just as likely nuke everything than actually maintain a piece of code running in production.
[–] theptip 3 days ago
It’s asymmetrical though. Google is terrible at product and moves glacially slow.
Anthropic can take the parts of Google it needs FAR faster than Google can do the reverse.
[–] shrinks99 3 days ago
[–] KerrAvon 3 days ago
[–] thisismyaccoun7 2 days ago
[–] tsunamifury 3 days ago
[–] verdverm 3 days ago
[–] tsunamifury 3 days ago
[–] verdverm 3 days ago