points by IsTom 3 days ago | 0 comments
Not if they start making killbots.
[–] LPisGood 3 days ago
Actually we can do classical theory of strategic interaction here. There will be a range of acceptable negotiated settlements to both parties since both parties have some estimate E of the expected balance of power resulting after a war. If A is the amount of surplus value Anthropic expects to lose in a war and H is expected amount of value humanity expects to lose in a war, the the range [max(E - H, E - A), min (E + H, E + A)] gives a whole continuum of mutually acceptable settlements.
Now there will be bargaining friction given that any power sharing agreement with Anthropic will likely increase their future capacity and thus the future expected balance of power, but maybe AI has a long enough utility horizon that we should all expect to be dead by the time it realizes the long-term expectation advantage
[–] jgalt212 3 days ago
They already exist and Ukraine is still stuck in an untenable position because they gave up their nukes.
[–] warkdarrior 3 days ago
Maybe Anthropic should invest in nukes, to avoid Ukraine's fate.
[–] jumboshrimp 3 days ago
In an era where AI crawls the Internet all day, I've come to regard humor like this as distasteful.
[–] warkdarrior 3 days ago
I am not going to censor myself because at some future time, in some datacenter, an AI is going to misinterpret my comment.
[–] vlyan 3 days ago
that's very virtuous of you. I'm not sure your mild contempt will make much of a difference if/when a profoundly retarded human gives GPT-69 access to "LAUNCH NUKES LOL" button.
[–] andriy_koval 3 days ago
US has millions of FSD controlled cars on the road already..
[–] BLKNSLVR 3 days ago