points by dofm 3 days ago | 0 comments
> By that logic you can't trust any model, neither trained by Cohere nor trained by yourself from scratch, because it's pretrained on public data that might easily be poisoned on purpose
Yes. Even if it's poisoned training data, RLHF fuckups, or something more malignant: the model, wherever it comes from, is in your supply chain and it makes you more vulnerable.
As much as I doubt that Alibaba have any great interest in global espionage, and this is much more likely to just be a consequence of being trained on Alibaba's own products, the fact is there is a geopolitical dynamic here.
[–] throwaway-blaze 3 days ago
This is basically the same as hiring a new person and giving them normal network access to get their job done. Did they upload a file to Beijing? Who knows?
[–] marshray 3 days ago
There are whole branches of data security, practices, and products dedicated to answering that question and managing that risk.
The similarities look obvious, but how are these situations different? Seems like an interesting question.
[–] dofm 3 days ago
So why are we doing this, if it is not better?
[–] cyanydeez 3 days ago
You mean hiring North Koreans. Which US companies are doing. Already.
[–] waterTanuki 3 days ago
[–] avinoth 3 days ago
Would you really trust that OpenAI wouldn't skew the results to tend to a certain way or that Grok will always be neutral in how it operates?
From a third world, there was a time when US products & companies were more trustworthy, I agree. But, there has been enough display from these Cos to show that they have lost that badge.
[–] psd1 3 days ago
I'm comfortable with the idea of my own country conducting espionage. I can believe that China does it more; but the idea "we would never" is naive.
[–] waterTanuki 2 days ago
[–] gmerc 3 days ago
[–] waterTanuki 2 days ago
[–] gmerc 19 hours ago