[–] gavmor 1 day ago
[–] thenthenthen 1 day ago
[–] Imustaskforhelp 1 day ago
[–] thenthenthen 1 day ago
[–] doubled112 22 hours ago
[–] echelon 1 day ago
If you do regular image gen, you can see that these images demonstrate memorized styles, broken anatomy, bad text layout (or hallucinated text), etc. Even the old Dall-E watermark is a throwback.
Generation times are orthogonal.
[–] dahart 1 day ago
[–] gavmor 1 day ago
Here's my homelab blog: https://www.gavmor.com/regular-labs/
Maybe I'm just not that observant, but all these pictures are just... "LGTM."
When I'm generating, I have really specific adherence/performance goals.
[–] thecodebeats 1 day ago
[–] pants2 3 days ago
In some ways I prefer looking at these over the hyper-polished 2026 image generators tbh.
[–] vunderba 3 days ago
It’s not really intended to be viewed chronologically but there is a progress metric that shows how models have improved their scores over time, which might help you compare earlier models with later models such as Ideogram4 or Moss-Image released in 2026.
[–] DonHopkins 1 day ago
[–] vunderba 1 day ago
The only DALL-E 2 images [1] I could dig up in my archives that matched any of the bench prompts was the Alexander the Great prompt:
A painting of Alexander the Great riding a hippity hop into battle. The hippity hop toy was an old children’s toy that looked like a giant rubber ball with rubber handles that one straddle and ride.
And while it's not exactly the same, DALL-E Mini [2] (from back in 2021) is still around and you can run it locally using pretty modest hardware.[1] - https://imgpb.com/ZyzuX
[–] fleshers 1 day ago
(I do wish this had a before/after sort of comparison to demonstrate newer sota models handling the same prompts)
[–] dado3212 1 day ago
[–] fleshers 17 hours ago
Fun anecdote related to the first point about AI posters etc: my non-technical mother and her group of elderly Mahjong friends, who don’t care about or are completely ambivalent about AI, ate at a small restaurant in their town recently, and they were confused and annoyed by the new menu that was one of those maximalist and grotesque one-shot cheap model designs. Now it’s spoiled for her and she notices the awful styles everywhere in person and online. So I do think the tide there must be turning soon, at least against that minimal effort slop ad/menu copy
I love the Eno quote, I think I’ll check out that diary
[–] karim79 1 day ago
I always found the commercial stuff to be complete rubbish. I was astounded by how I could just spend a couple of hours using open models and open source software to produce better results.
[–] renegade-otter 1 day ago
[–] k12sosse 1 day ago
[–] karim79 1 day ago
What surprised me was that I basically "solved" image generation locally when it became a thing and then lost interest immediately after.
Commercial models/systems are stupid if you ask me. There is just no need for them anymore unless one needs ludicrous scale and has a fat wallet. And can tolerate all the shit that comes with nsfw bias.
[–] cellsstudio 1 day ago
For a side project that's very art-asset heavy (and that I'm picky on), it takes me about an hour to get from an initial sketch up to a final image that I'm fairly happy with.
[–] WillAdams 1 day ago
I've been moderately curious if one could get such a description of the visual aspects of an image and make get consistency/repetition thus.
> “Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?”
> “That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,” said the Cat.
> “I don’t much care where—” said Alice.
> “Then it doesn’t matter which way you walk,” said the Cat.
(Lewis Carroll)