points by HaZeust 3 days ago | 0 comments
I mean, read the decision. Any evidence that proves whether a contested event or action was "official" or not is inadmissible in court. The Courts cannot investigate the President's motives when deciding whether an action was official or unofficial, and prosecutors cannot use evidence of immune official presidential acts to establish criminal liability, even when prosecuting separate, unofficial conduct.
We simply HAVE to take the Executive's word for whether an action was official or not.
[–] AreYouBreedRead 2 days ago
America is cooked SMH
[–] techlover14159 3 days ago
[–] HaZeust 3 days ago