points by pcstl 3 days ago | 0 comments
I think you misunderstood, I believe they were requesting a layperson-friendly explanation of the conjecture and not a statement of it.
[–] jibalt 3 days ago
How is "This proves that EXP != NP", which is false, a layperson-friendly explanation of the actual proof that 3SAT is sub-exponential?
[–] caughtinthought 3 days ago
Which is a separate issue than the one you commented originally
[–] moishe_syzslak 3 days ago