Hacker News
points by Dylan16807 3 days ago | 0 comments
It's a lot better than just "source available". You can do most things as if it was open source. The difference between "you can sell it but you have to provide code to anyone you sell it to" and "you can't sell it but you can sell support and development services" is pretty minor.

The two main restrictions on top of that are "no paid API" which also seems pretty minor when the whole intent of this is local operation, and excluding large companies which is pretty low impact.

[–] LeoWattenberg 3 days ago
"You may not repackage, redistribute... this tool" sounds very much source-available to me.
[–] Dylan16807 2 days ago
It's badly written. But section 2.c is all about how you can redistribute.