points by Routine8502 3 days ago | 0 comments
Enough! I think it's a reasonably fair test of the models. Let's put it this way, I use the same process to resolve problems outside my peak expertise, and I find it works well.
I think the solution is easy enough that any competent colleague would come up with it. Some variant on it has probably even been published (hence why I'm not chomping at the bit to publish). I think it comes down to the models being extremely spiky, and the problems they're trying to solve being easily verifiable in code.
[–] Buttons840 3 days ago
[–] Routine8502 3 days ago
[–] eru 3 days ago
However current frontier models got good enough at websearch and thinking through the problem, that they can finally piece together the answer from my own public writing (eg on stackoverflow). And recently someone wrote up an answer to the problem and put it on Arxiv.
[–] Buttons840 2 days ago
"Forebears" is a site that ranks the popularity of names. They rank the name I used at 324,668.
This is why I believe the AI can be significantly influenced by a single person.
[–] eru 2 days ago
[–] Buttons840 2 days ago
I'm pretty sure the name has moved to different AIs somehow too. I've seen the name used on Grok, and also on NovelAI. I've forgotten the exact details.
[–] Routine8502 2 days ago