Fission hasn't exactly taken the world by storm.
There are a few nice advantages fusion has, but they are more important once we want to reach the stars as far as I can tell; not this century on this planet.
But I'm just an armchair analyst. You probably have a much better understanding.
[–] Routine8502 3 days ago
[–] eru 2 days ago
It's just probably not economically feasible, ie it would be a waste of resources to rush fusion so much.
> I just find it to be an interesting problem!
Ha, that's why I was working Zero Knowledge Proofs for quite a while. I don't even hold any cryptocurrency or other crypto assets.
[–] Routine8502 2 days ago
Therefore, most credible folks are talking a 2-3 facility staged approach. And probably 5 years per facility to build, and 5 years per to test.
Also, remember that even with huge cash pools, you have supply chain problems. Some of the nonlinear optics takes a fixed amount of time to fabricate.
[–] eru 2 days ago
A giant water tank that you detonate H-bombs in should work, and even be energy positive. :)
I just find it to be an interesting problem! My hope is it happens before I die. My rule of thumb is anyone who says energy on the grid in < 10 years is a blatant liar.