points by aliasxneo 3 days ago | 0 comments
It seems like you're trying to imply this was an intentional bias due to the nationality of the model authors. But the first sentence of the article is:
"On September 8, 2026, we were alerted by a security researcher, Gadi Evron from Knostic, to a tenant isolation issue affecting the GLM-5.3 Workers AI model (@cf/zai-org/glm-5.3) starting on August 27, 2026."
Meaning the issue was a cache exposure with the GLM-5.3 Workers AI model. If the title was, "Cache exposure issue with GLM-5.3," I would agree it's ambiguous and maybe intentionally harmful. But it literally says, "Workers AI model" which is clearly a Cloudflare product.
[–] jacquesm 3 days ago
[–] weird-eye-issue 3 days ago
Why are you bringing up people's nationalities? This seems incredibly inappropriate
[–] aliasxneo 2 days ago
Probably because there's an on-going conspiracy that's been all over HN that these large corporations are on a smear campaign against Chinese models.
[–] jacquesm 2 days ago
You're the one perpetuating that.
[–] aliasxneo 2 days ago
Yes, because debunking something is equivalent to perpetuating it. Can't imply someone might be racist because then you perpetuate racism. That literally makes no sense lol.
[–] jacquesm 2 days ago
You can't debunk that which isn't said.
[–] aliasxneo 2 days ago
It has been said, ad naesuem, all over HN for weeks now. I pegged the OP wrong.
[–] weird-eye-issue 2 days ago
You are a weirdo just making things up
[–] aliasxneo 2 days ago
What a quaint rebuttal.
[–] weird-eye-issue 2 days ago
You didn't even provide anything logical to rebute in the first place. So my comment was not a rebuttal, just an observation
Downthread I suggested "Cloudflare configuration error leaked data between user sessions" which I think is far better. You could improve on it further: "Cloudflare AI worker configuration error leaked data between user sessions". But this could have happened with any model.