points by crazygringo 3 days ago | 0 comments
But in this case, most people really truly don't have an issue with it.
It's a very small minority who cares.
[–] neya 3 days ago
[–] Klonoar 3 days ago
You can’t prove your inverse take tho.
[–] neya 3 days ago
Reading comprehension is important. There was no inverse take here. Just pointing out anecdotal evidence isn't enough to draw a conclusion over a larger sample size.
[–] Klonoar 2 days ago
Mmm nope, that trick doesn't work here today.
You want them to cite sources for something they can't possibly cite. I'm telling you that you are doing the same thing they are: confidently asserting that you're correct even though you cannot possibly prove that.
It is not a difficult concept.
[–] neya 2 days ago
> confidently asserting that you're correct
Where did you see this? The acoustics in your head must be wild:))
[–] mahboi 2 days ago
> The acoustics in your head must be wild
Source?
[–] drawfloat 3 days ago
Most people don’t even know what a refresh rate is. They don’t know why it’s measured in hz. They certainly don’t know what 60 vs 120 means.
Cite your sources, please or you're just echoing "trust me, bro".