[–] wallst07 2 days ago
[–] restalis 2 days ago
[–] gregglain 2 days ago
One case I recall was an SRE that was quite intelligent asking smart questions and management took it as insubordination. The thing is he was fighting against shipping crap that later would ruin oncall.
Another time a coworker solved a big problem, saving time. But because management was not too involved, she got a pip.
One would assume making the system more reliable would get rewarded, in some contexts this is true. Others, it has to be blessed otherwise it can cut against.
[–] locknitpicker 2 days ago
What does this even mean? This sounds like an euphemism for someone being a jerk just because they wanted to unilaterally push changes to the code.
> It saddens me when management supports egos more than the product. It shows up years later to the customers.
Management are hired to support the people that maintain the product, and help them work together. If a developer fails to work together with coworkers, it's the manager's job to either help that developer right their wrongs, or support other developers by getting rid of the problematic one.
You might 'care' to add features nobody asked for? Or 'care' to spend longer than necessary to refactor something that doesn't need it.