points by brookst 2 days ago | 0 comments
This is the “absence of evidence is proof of existence” mindset.
[–] fxwin 2 days ago
it's not proof of existence, but it's suspicious unless there is a good reason why cryptography should be more immune to AI driven progress than other disciplines.
If i knew an elephant had walked through my porcelain store, and miraculously all the blue cups survived intact while every other type of cup was smashed to pieces, I'd guess that someone took steps to preserve them.
[–] tomaskafka 2 days ago