Hacker News
points by schnitzelstoat 2 days ago | 0 comments
They aren't mutually exclusive - we should have more of both.
[–] Zigurd 2 days ago
Nuclear is bad capital allocation. The reasons nuclear is expensive are very very difficult to overcome, whereas if you can make a solar cell cheaper, solar gets cheaper. Nuclear operating expenses, nuclear safety and security expenses, and decommissioning expenses constitute multiple difficult problems none with straightforward solutions.
[–] schnitzelstoat 2 days ago
It reduces risk though - solar power will be much less useful if battery tech doesn't continue to improve, and we can't be certain that it will.
[–] Zigurd 2 days ago
That's the thing about capital allocation: you can reduce risk as much or more by buying batteries and more solar panels, and you can get it next week at a reliable price.

Nuclear is expensive because of risk, and a lot of that risk is just project risk. Nuclear doesn't get built on time or on budget because project management so often goes sideways. It's not the permits or the protesters.]