[–] Tangurena2 2 days ago
[–] WillPostForFood 2 days ago
[–] mring33621 1 day ago
[–] rdiddly 2 days ago
[–] cowlevel 2 days ago
[–] phoghed 1 day ago
It’s basically synonymous with user-generated content site. It’s why TikTok is social media and Netflix isn’t, and PineDrama is somewhere in the middle because even though it’s studio content there’s still emphasis on the comments and whatnot.
[–] thaumasiotes 2 days ago
This is clearly untrue; they're called "social media" because they developed inside other things that were already called "social media".
[–] cowlevel 2 days ago
[–] thaumasiotes 2 days ago
[–] cowlevel 2 days ago
[–] andreyf 1 day ago
That is the problem -- if legislators aren't informed how the laws they wrote are interpreted / used by the executive, they cannot reason about how to legislate next.
[–] rdiddly 15 hours ago
The principle upon which courts themselves are founded is basically science - An assertion is only an assertion, and doesn't become legitimate unless it 1) has evidence backing it, and 2) survives adversarial argumentation. That which is proven and can't be disproven is deemed true. Where criminal accusations are concerned, it's what distinguishes a just verdict from mere arbitrary tyranny. That is the favor being done for prosecutors by defense attorneys: giving their wins legitimacy.
But the whole proceeding is public so that the people, the actual legitimate authority in the land, have access to the same evidence and the same arguments, and can reach the same conclusion reached by their agents and representatives in the court. The verdict is just and everybody knows it.
All I'm doing is applying the same principle to the FISA court itself. If they're so trustworthy and secure, so worthy of the job of interpreting laws, it should be no problem to present evidence to that effect, by opening the proceedings. Anything that needs to be done secretly kind of needs to shed the name of "court" and become e.g. "agency" or "department."
[–] tastyfreeze 2 days ago
[–] aqme28 1 day ago
- Milton Mayer - They Thought They Were Free. The Germans, 1933-45
[–] rnd0 2 days ago
[–] navigate8310 2 days ago
[–] LtWorf 2 days ago
[–] kakacik 2 days ago
There are many places which are more democratic and free than US ever was, its not a secret information but you won't hear about it in latest hollywood flick or fox/cnn. One only needs to travel a bit outside US bubble with open mind.
US system of 2 parties is pretty dumb if you think about it, artificial in pretty bad ways and not really transferable elsewhere. Constitution and laws which are less than toilet paper when power is taken by sufficiently motivated bad actor, 0 working checks and balances. It could have been worse of course if thats how we want to rank it, but we are not even in the half of it and something tells me we haven't seen the worst of it yet.
[–] contingencies 2 days ago
[–] rstuart4133 2 days ago
Over time it's become evident open model is far, far more effective at ensuring the public has confidence the people running the place are doing the right thing. It does risk the occasional unwarranted "witch hunt". But that threat ensures powerful people avoid doing things that while above board, could arouse public suspicion. Less suspicious acts mean higher trust in the government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Chamber
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights