points by Zambyte 2 days ago | 0 comments
From the auto-generated captions on the YouTube video on this page.
> Genie form [sic] can simulate scenarios
It's kind of amazing: the juxtaposition of such advanced generative AI and such terrible speech-to-text coming from the same parent company.
[–] fwip 2 days ago
[–] artisin 2 days ago
When you're high on vibes, the line between music and audio-like music tends to blur.
[–] kridsdale1 2 days ago
These days, unproofread text adds authenticity.
[–] fwip 2 days ago
Only when it's a mistake that a human being would plausibly make.
[–] phoghed 2 days ago
The volume of content on YouTube is enormous, I’m kind of surprised they offer auto captions at all given that they have little to no competition in the space.
[–] rustyhancock 2 days ago
Is it surprising? Indexing for search is the backbone of Google's business model.
It's why if you search a practical task you will often see results link to specific parts of a video.
[–] Zambyte 2 days ago
Ok but like, surely the Deepmind team could sneeze and get flawless captions for this video. Why rely on the default YouTube captions instead of just attaching correct ones? It seems silly.
[–] phoghed 2 days ago
Yeah if they cared they could create their own captions for sure. They probably didn’t even think about it. Maybe some intern will do it after reading this thread
[–] panarky 2 days ago
Typos mean the text came from a human.
> Genie 4 is natively multimodal, enabling audio-like music, ambient noises, and interactive dialogue to be simultaneously generated with the world.
(Emphasis mine). Like, yeah, I'd sure hope the music is similar to audio.
I wonder if this was a de-LLMese pass gone wrong, and the original was "enabling audio -- like music, ambient noises, and interactive dialogue -- to be simultaneously generated with the world.