Hacker News
points by crazygringo 2 days ago | 0 comments
No, latency hasn't gotten worse.

It just hasn't gotten better.

Fundamentally, whenever latency gets too bad, developers fix it. But often not until then. So it always just kind of sits there at the edge of just-barely-tolerable. Which is defined by human behavior, not chip speed or similar.

I remember iTunes in the 2000's taking several seconds to respond to user actions. I remember using software like PageMaker in the 1980's that would take forever to respond. Lotus Notes in the 1990's was horrible. Running antivirus would slow your system to a crawl. Other stuff from the 2000's -- Acrobat Reader, or Outlook.

It's always been an issue with apps on the computer.

[–] publlus_enigma 2 days ago
https://danluu.com/input-lag/

Some aspects have definitely gotten worse. For example, the latency between pressing a key and a glyph appearing on the screen.

[–] crazygringo 2 days ago
I think the subject here is broader UX latency, measured in hundreds of milliseconds to multiple seconds.

I've been using computers for over 40 years now, and I've never been impacted by the latency between keypress and letter rendering in my life except for on e-ink. That's not something I see anybody complaining about.

[–] publlus_enigma 2 days ago
I get it regularly today, especially in applications like Teams. I can type sufficiently quickly that it isn't uncommon for characters to buffer, and for the cumulative effect of the latency ti be that my sentence finishes displaying 2-3 seconds after I finish typing it.
[–] crazygringo 1 day ago
Fair enough! I'm lucky enough not to use Teams, I've heard the horror stories but I had no idea it was that bad.
[–] hulitu 19 hours ago
> No, latency hasn't gotten worse.

Just compare the start of Notepad in Win9x with the start of Notepad in Win11