As an analog, I don't feel it's much value to ay "Facebook sucks, use Hacker News" (or any of the hundred other social media that are not a data harvesting platform). The existence of (more) ethical alternativea doesn't erase that fact that most are on unethical software. Likewise, there being efficient software doesn't invalidate that most people are on electron powered services that each take up GB's of data.
[–] carlosjobim 2 days ago
[–] johnnyanmac 2 days ago
That's basically been the attitude of politics for awhile now. And I see that result doesn't end well.
This is comparatively harmless, but I'm overall trying to unsubscribe from that paradigm of "let stupid stupid". I at every least want to help contribute to alternatives if others wake up one day.
[–] carlosjobim 2 days ago
[–] johnnyanmac 2 days ago
For larger topics, you tackle system, not people.
[–] carlosjobim 1 day ago
[–] imtringued 1 day ago
You say you want X but you do Y.
But then you say you don't want X, you want someone to magically make Y as good as X.
That type of wishful thinking is all the rage in politics.
User 1: There are no good cars anymore!
User 2: You can get this car A or this car B which are good.
User 1: But I have car C which isn't good!
I didn't claim in my original comment that all or most software was high quality. I said that high quality software is generally available for MacOS. Then it's up to each person what they do.