Hacker News

points by joshAg 2 days ago | 0 comments

It didn't seem like it, because section 2 directly discusses the issue you raised and why individuals aren't in a position to adequately prevent deskilling on by themselves. OK, you disagree with it, but you don't even engage with the actual argument it makes.

[–] kian 2 days ago

Just because individuals may not be fully aware of the consequences of their actions does not make them suddenly not responsible for them. See for example not studying well in college, eating poorly, not exercising, walking around barefoot in hookworm country, leaving food out while camping in bear country, and swimming without underwear in candiru-infested rivers.

[–] snayan 2 days ago

While this may be the prevailing POV in the present, it certainly wasn't always this way. Expressive individualism is an anomaly in the grand scheme of human history.

[–] kian 1 day ago

Many things that we treasure are anomalies in the grand scheme of human history. Treating other races as human beings, valuing life and human potential, believing that everyone including women should be educated... How's that appeal to historical authority apply in those cases? Perhaps you're also a monarchist? In which case, my bad, at least you're consistent :)