Hacker News
points by zahlman 2 days ago | 0 comments
Cycling carbon between CO2 and synthetic hydrocarbons, and presumably using clean energy for the recovery step, seems like basically just a complex solar+battery scheme (and I can't really see it being more efficient, although it produces denser storage). Sequestering the CO2 in carbonate rock makes more sense to me (and that has actual chemical uses too).
[–] defrost 2 days ago
Alternatively, sequestering in ultramafic rock to transform to carbonate rock and make a bit of orange hydrogen on the side to power the scheme.

* https://research.csiro.au/carbonlock/geological-properties-o...

* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036031992...

Hacker News