points by nomel 2 days ago | 0 comments
> on typed python code.
A fairly massive undertaking for existing code, which jit was supposed to be useful for.
[–] zahlman 2 days ago
I would imagine that the LLM has a much easier time adding correct type annotations to old Python code than it does translating it to C.
[–] EdwardDiego 2 days ago
In my experiments with this, maybe, sorta, it'll do some AST stuff then it'll go "dang this shit is dynamic AF" then suggest a static type inference tool, then a runtime type profiler.
Which honestly, is the right approach.
[–] EdwardDiego 2 days ago