Your expectation is the point, not the physics. I'm not arguing that their model has an amazing grasp of physics. I'm arguing that this can be used as a predictive internal model for a robot.
I hear you, but my objection comes from the stress on "realism" in Google's post: how Genie4 is modeling the "real world" so well. If they didn't crow so much about realism, I wouldn't have cared as much.
[–] mlmonkey 1 day ago