[–] ProllyInfamous 1 day ago
[–] Dylan16807 1 day ago
But a web page just sits there. And I never scroll slowly enough for refresh rate to matter, I go for big jumps that look the same on anything faster than e-ink. The benefit I get from a faster screen during normal desktop activities is slightly better mouse precision and latency.
[–] skybrian 1 day ago
[–] raegis 1 day ago
[–] ProllyInfamous 1 day ago
In psychedelic tongue: it drips well.
And it's getting so inexpensive (I can easily price many 120Hz systems, barely above $1000)!
How much (approx) was your son's build?
[–] ProllyInfamous 1 day ago
I avoid any-higher refresh rates, by your own reasoning =P
I still maintain an entire fleet of 30Hz equipment, but my main two machines are each 144Hz (sharing one screen $$). The $600 Mac Mini handles this easily. Obviously the other's nVidia GPU is a different $tory$$$$ == PoE@144Hz so_pretty
My favorite digital reading method, conversely, is probably less than 1Hz (eInk)? But even hundred of pages of text I'll always prefer printouts.
I spent three decades @30Hz, and just the past few ≥60Hz@4K... as I've aged I appreciate the analogue more, and the jarring stutters of 30Hz are constant reminders of computized digitality.
Also, PoE at 144Hz is incredible (I went from <30Hz to 144Hz with this one simple trick: $1000 5070Ti, which turns out was actually a great investment, too [today's price $1449]). But so is scrolling through walls of text, now.
¢¢