Hacker News
points by alistairSH 1 day ago | 0 comments
They won't flee. The tax would have to astronomical to offset the advantages of doing business in the US. If that wasn't true, they would have all disclaimed their US citizenship and moved to Monaco already.
[–] reliabilityguy 1 day ago
This is not the question I asked. I asked how and why would it be better for the rest of us?

For the record, I’m not necessarily opposed to the idea of taxation on the wealthy, but I want to understand why having no rich is better for everyone.

Extraordinary claims, etc

[–] alistairSH 1 day ago
Fair, and I don't believe we'd be better off if they fled. We would be better off if they weren't astronomically wealthy. I don't have a specific number in mind, but "a billion-ish" feels like a reasonable upper bound on wealth.

I'd also note that I would prefer to adjust tax/accounting laws to prevent the accumulation in the first place, not just roll out a blanket "take everything over a billion-ish law" as that feels more like a band-aid than a fix.

[–] reliabilityguy 1 day ago
> adjust tax/accounting laws to prevent the accumulation in the first place

Yes, I agree with this one. Some sort of reform on estate and inheritance is long overdue.

[–] alistairSH 1 day ago
That, and something to "force" payment in cold-hard cash instead of stock.