Which makes the initial promise to vote a certain way in exchange for donations itself illegal. That seems fine. So what is the problem with transparency, again?
This subthread is a discussion about pertains to politicians misrepresenting their voting intentions in order to get donations. My comment was a response to an argument that allowing politicians to do this is a good thing because it allows them to vote their "consciences" while pretending otherwise to people donating to them.
[–] snowwrestler 1 day ago
[–] Gormo 1 day ago
[–] snowwrestler 1 day ago
It is not. You’re not reading carefully enough.