points by LoganDark 1 day ago | 0 comments
The article warned of this already (re-applying the fix after updates). That update was likely already in the pipeline before this debacle. No one can say for sure though.
[–] ForHackernews 1 day ago
[–] LoganDark 1 day ago
LOL'd, you're literally correct though. I could unironically see Apple doing that given just a few things. And I'd prefer it to a vendor who stays silent about it until they have a full update out, and then just calls the deaths unfortunate or something. Or like, a vendor who already has the update ready, but withholds it while people continue to blow up because an embargo is more important for some reason.
It's right there in the article, look how proactive they're being!