points by flowerlad 1 day ago | 0 comments
Emacs is awesome, but it is unfortunate that on Windows it still only supports x64, which is a legacy platform at this point. Hopefully arm64 will be supported soon as well!
[–] tikhonj 1 day ago
or, maybe more hopefully, Windows as a whole becomes a legacy platform soon :)
[–] iLemming 1 day ago
Emacs is a serious tool, you choose it first and only then prioritize on the OS. It's like complaining that editing videos with Adobe Premiere on Linux is not a very solid experience, or something like that. Well, if you're a pro video-editor and you must use Premiere, then maybe you need a non-Linux box to do that?
[–] tikhonj 1 day ago
I like to tell people that consumer OSes are just Emacs hypervisors. And it's pretty clear which are better or worse :)
[–] iLemming 1 day ago
It's almost not even funny, but I tangle all my dotfiles from an org-mode file. The files it generates are all read-only - to discourage me from writing in them directly. This makes my OS config semi-immutable. Bootstrapping a system from scratch takes no longer than a few minutes and the biggest bottleneck is properly getting access to that dotfiles.org and installing Emacs. This has worked for years and that's why I never had to really learn Nix. I guess Emacs for me is the "true OS", and whatever on top is "just kernel stuff"
[–] pjmlp 1 day ago
Ask Valve how it is going with their plans to drop Proton.
[–] tikhonj 1 day ago
Proton is the shim for backwards compatibility with a messy legacy system. We've all been there.
And we've also seen how legacy systems refuse to die :(
[–] pjmlp 21 hours ago
What do we call 1970's OS design in 2026?
I have an idea, from someone famous in hacker circles,
"Using Unix is the computing equivalent of listening only to music by David Cassidy"
-- Rob Pike
[–] globular-toast 1 day ago
Source?
[–] internet_points 20 hours ago
pretty sure it was meant sarcastically
[–] pjmlp 1 day ago