points by watwut 1 day ago | 0 comments
Previously, they claimed they stand with nazi solely for free speech of everyone purposes, not because they would share the oppressive authoritarian ideology of nazi.
If that was true, that is why.
Now in reality, that was not true, they stood with nazi cause they themselves are nazi who want to bully others.
[–] cyberjerkXX 1 day ago
[–] buellerbueller 1 day ago
>I can gauge how much of an authoritarian you are with one simple question, is it immoral to privately own the means of production?
You keep using the term authoritarian but I don't think you actually know what it means.
[–] watwut 1 day ago
I meant nazi. Yes I know what it means. Yes they exist and even on the rise.
And they were go to example of important free speech for years. The gauge was always defending nazi free speech, never defending communist free speech, radical feminists free speech or whoever else free speech.
Your question supposed to determine authoritanianism shows the same fallacy - nazi and other fascists wont count as an authoritarian. If I think all women should be locked at home and be under control of husbands, you wont count me as authoritarian either.
I can gauge how much of an authoritarian you are with one simple question, is it immoral to privately own the means of production?