Hacker News

points by matkoniecz 1 day ago | 0 comments

> Someone still needs to take liability for mistakes.

I am not aware of setups available to me that would transfer liability onto accountant.

So in either case I am taking liability.

(also, I am pretty sure that if corporation loses 10 millions over accountant making bad decisions, they are not going to recover that funds either)

[–] ffwang2 1 day ago

yeah i think liability ultimately lies on the individual. of course, you could sue your accountant, but that feels hard, maybe almost as hard as suing the model providers.

[–] skinfaxi 1 day ago

Yes, at least in the US the individual must sign their own return.

[–] matkoniecz 1 day ago

At least in Poland it is not viable. Friend's business lost noticeable amount of money because accountant has not filed taxes and lied that they filed and lied that they checked it.

And there was no real path to recovering funds, except small part, after long court case.

At least they were able to fire them without severance pay.

[–] TheOtherHobbes 1 day ago

This seems to be usual. Accountants are liable for crimes like embezzlement, but tax authorities hold individual tax payers responsible. If tax payers want to recover losses they have to go to court, which is often risky because accountants will say the client didn't do A, B, and C.

[–] matkoniecz 14 hours ago

> Accountants are liable for crimes like embezzlement

and even then, if they already lost all money you may be unable to recover it