Hacker News
points by jawns 1 day ago | 0 comments
I can understand alphabetical ordering in some circumstances, but if the point is to indicate which model family is lighter or heavier, surely atomic numbers should be taken into account?!?

Argon - 18

Boron - 5

Carbon - 6

I don't think I'll be able to cope with this level of elemental disorder.

[–] VulgarExigency 1 day ago
It's gonna be even worse then they name the 11th iteration Potassium.
[–] brainwad 1 day ago
They'll never get there since there's no J at all ;)
[–] WithinReason 1 day ago
The naming is elementary, my dear Watson.
[–] ahsillyme 1 day ago
I thought Carbon for composable stood well on it's own marketing. As did Argon, for impervious. Next to one another the pair comes off utterly cockeyed and sleazy.