Hacker News
points by spwa4 1 day ago | 0 comments
Are you trying to make the case against Anthropic stronger? Because these are not arguments against Swartz (and other people) but they apply much stronger against Anthropic.

But we all know: billionnaires don't have to face responsibility for their actions, and the justice system is fundamentally dishonest. To REALLY drive that point home, let's do what you suggest and go over the worst crimes of Aaron Swartz. You know, the reason the FBI drove him to suicide to force him

> What if they get blocked from the network and repeatedly change accounts, IPs and then MACs repeatedly to get around progressively escalating blocks from the network admins?

Anthropic has done this, and a LOT more than Aaron Swartz ever did.

> What if they hide a laptop in a wiring closet and then try to come back for it while covering up their face to hide from a camera inside of it?

Anthropic has done this, and a LOT more than Aaron Swartz ever did.

> What if they run from the police who try to stop them?

Anthropic has done this, and a LOT more than Aaron Swartz ever did.

But why stop there?

* What if despite all the above they KEPT hacking more?

Anthropic has done this.

* What if they did not just hack system, but tried to deceive humans into publishing malicious code into government systems, both succesfully and unsuccesfully

Anthropic has done this.

* Same as the above, but with physical treats against the safety of the software maintainers?

Anthropic has done this.

* What if after all that, they state that they would develop bioweapons?

Anthropic has done this.

Can you imagine a human hacker without money doing this? They would have been shot on the spot rather than arrested. Yet, somehow, I don't think Dario Amodei will face that sort of attention ...

Aún no hay comentarios.