Hacker News
points by officeplant 1 day ago | 0 comments
>I don’t understand this hard anti-ai stance from open-source groups except as a submission volume issue.

plagiarism machine can not be trusted.

therefore plagiarism machine must not be allowed to make decisions.

[–] Revanche1367 21 hours ago
Plagiarism is on the part of the companies making them, the machine cannot really intend things and thus are not the things that are "guilty" of plagiarism. It also doesn't have to be the thing that decides anything, you can still decide anything of importance while acting as a guide.
[–] da_chicken 1 day ago
Especially when it's the corporate plagiarism machine owned by the amoral billionaire class that is profiting wildly off the well-paid legislature's shocking sudden disinterest in protecting the rights and privacy of the people after the capture of the first, second, and third branches alongside the fourth estate.

People are tired of exploding costs, loss of privacy, intrusive technology, pervasive advertising, malignant anti-intellectualism, endless rent-seeking products, and fascist leadership. Adding economic crisis from job loss is a fast track to violence.

I use AI and see it's value and even I'm furious about how it's going.

Hacker News