This isn’t some mystery, this isn’t happening in a vacuum. There are correlated trends like rising profits of the food industry, food becoming plasticized. Everyone’s fat now
[–] Alacart 1 day ago
[–] redanddead 1 day ago
That’s not how science works
Show me correlating graphs to the rise in colorectal cancer. There has to be a meta-analysis about this, my money is on food being a major contributing factor
[–] nostrademons 1 day ago
https://tylervigen.com/spurious/custom_correlation/757_new-c...
No wait it's GMO use in corn grown in Texas:
https://tylervigen.com/spurious/custom_correlation/758_new-c...
No wait it's the popularity of the first name Devon:
https://tylervigen.com/spurious/custom_correlation/759_new-c...
No wait it's the number of postal service machine operators in Texas:
https://tylervigen.com/spurious/custom_correlation/760_new-c...
Pretty certain this isn't how science works either. Be careful mistaking correlation for causation, and in relying on intuitive hunches.
[–] declan_roberts 1 day ago
[–] teiferer 1 day ago
Your sibling comment from 1 minute earlier:
> I am personally dealing with colon cancer, and one of the incredibly annoying things about the awful disease is the number of truly clueless people who use it to advance some culinary agenda they believe in without evidence.
[–] TFNA 1 day ago
[–] redanddead 1 day ago
There’s an overconsumption of sugar
Sugar is awesome for cancer
"The data showed that the age-adjusted incidence rate fell from 55.2 per 100,000 in 2000 to 36.7 in 2022, then rose to 38.3 in 2023."
Were more people fat back in 2000? Was the food worse? Though I don’t really doubt that the food industry and trends like you mentioned do contribute, that stat also seems to directly contradict the hypothesis.