Sadly, I concur. Their submission history is reminiscent of other motivated accounts that dilute the website's intellectual curiosity with zero-sum editorials. It's certainly deliberate, and their comment history seems to defend the submissions rather than conceding their obvious low quality.

Perhaps these sorts of accounts could be valuable if their submissions were auto-[dead] and needed a vouch to be seen. As-is, it's grinding down /new with a pattern of low-quality commentary and non-curious, partisan ragebait.