points by mirekrusin 1 day ago | 0 comments
Why their shares tanked 10% then?
[–] treis 1 day ago
[–] mirekrusin 1 day ago
Out of all companies, with their own TPUs and native large scale computing... "habitat" they exist in – they probably know how to spend it well.
[–] Anon1096 1 day ago
People on the internet really overrate google's TPU advantage. OAI and Anthropic and others have been using TPUs as well for a long time now too. And they've also hired lots and lots of talent from the rest of FAANG, hyperscale compute talent and knowledge is also well distributed through all the top AI companies at this point.
[–] UncleOxidant 1 day ago
Pretty sure it's this part:
> generating $127B in cash, and capital spending on property and equipment was $132B, so the business consumed $5B.
[–] mirekrusin 1 day ago
well, they don't burn it like anthropic on rent, they spend it on their own TPUs, right?
[–] hiddencost 1 day ago
It's about expectations. They missed expectations on earnings, meaning they're less valuable than people thought.
[–] paulpauper 1 day ago
because missed estiamtes https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/article/google-stock-pl...
Search increased revenue and profit which is good. Means that LLMs are not yet stealing revenue. But also bad because the massive spend on infrastructure doesn't look like it's going to come back as increased revenue.