Idk, I don't want the internet to be dictated by followers/engagement that can be easily botted via a SMM panel for pennies.
[–] dualvariable 1 day ago
And how come criticizing left-wing protests is fine, but bringing up right-wing botting/trolling operations on this website isn't?
"Curious..."
[–] jeremyjh 1 day ago
[–] kaldev 1 day ago
Organic protests of any sort is fine. Between this shit and the "ChaoticGood" marketing operation ran for Geese, you cannot begin to understand how much of the interaction you see on the web is bought and paid for.
[–] digitaltrees 1 day ago
[–] delecti 1 day ago
I don't think a movement having a bit of funding for the organizers is that big of a deal though. The actual protesters are there because they want to be.
Edit: He's actually the largest individual political donor ever within a single political cycle, which is still quite significant (he's outspending the next largest in this cycle by about 3:1), but also very different. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/27/tracking-the-money...
[–] CGMthrowaway 1 day ago
Do we know who was the largest individual political donor prior to Elon?
[–] anigbrowl 1 day ago
I also think they're pretty cringe, but that seems orthogonal to the question of why Meta is censoring their accounts. I haven't seen any suggestion that they violated meta's policies.
[–] stickfigure 1 day ago
What, you don't enjoy having your opinions dismissed because someone famous shares them?
[–] jfengel 1 day ago
[–] kaldev 1 day ago
You can go to an SMM panel right now and get a bot farm to rebrand tens of thousands of accounts on any platform to align with your messaging and spam the fuck out of replies to manufacture consensus. There is a very high chance this exact playbook worked on you lol.
[–] digitaltrees 1 day ago