points by gpvos 1 day ago | 0 comments
Depending on where, there can be lots and lots of small crossings. The cameras themselves might not be that expensive, but keeping them in working order is very nontrivial.
[–] 6510 1 day ago
[–] gpvos 21 hours ago
There is also the issue of recognition software that doesn't have too many false positives, and properly tuning it for each crossing, in all light situations. The amount of time and work needed can really be very large. I'm not against it though. Some pilot projects would be a good idea.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsuyLs_0C0I
If you can prevent just one of those (and if we ignore injury, trauma and death) it should cover expenses for quite some time.