points by 2001zhaozhao 1 day ago | 0 comments
I actually don't see any reason why I would use this instead of my Xreal Air (released like 3 years ago) + Samsung Dex. The phone is a perfect "compute puck" for wired AR glasses and Google even makes them, so why the heck are they selling separate compute pucks with these glasses and making them unaffordable?? Just make some pixel glasses that run android xr on the pixel phone instead
[–] ranger_danger 1 day ago
In my case I would need the puck if I'm out and about because my phone does not support DP Alt Mode.
[–] jayd16 1 day ago
[–] 2001zhaozhao 1 day ago
But even given that the glasses have to support hand tracking and 6DOF, I think they can probably build the sensors into the glasses but compute them with the phone. Or maybe calculating hand tracking would drain the battery of a Pixel too fast or something. Not sure.
[–] rao-v 1 day ago
[–] verdverm 1 day ago
Passthrough is lame compared to real AR
[–] jayd16 1 day ago
[–] verdverm 11 hours ago
looking closer, there are two lens like things, bulkier, as say compared to the hololens 2, which is my benchmark for AR/XR (bulky device, but singular lens)
The entire category is socially frowned upon right now as perv glasses because a non insignificant portion of males are utter pervs