Hacker News
points by miohtama 1 day ago | 0 comments
The only good products Google has ever built in-house are search and GMail. Everything else is acquisition or crappy product.

So we should ask “why would it be different this time.”

[–] ptero 1 day ago
IMO google maps and google earth were revolutionary when they came out. And maps stayed well ahead of competition for many many years.
[–] Keyframe 1 day ago
I'm one of those few that liked Google Wave!
[–] antonvs 1 day ago
There are ones of you!
[–] struant 1 day ago
Maps was originally an acquisition.
[–] gnothing 1 day ago
Both were acquisitions.
[–] mrheosuper 1 day ago
Youtube, hate it or not, is really good. The amount of data they have to handle everyday is on different level.
[–] afavour 1 day ago
For sure. It was an acquisition, though.
[–] adrithmetiqa 22 hours ago
Apart from search, what did Google make in house?
[–] masklinn 18 hours ago
Gmail? I don’t recall that being an acqui.
[–] transcriptase 1 day ago
Google finance was an incredible portfolio tracking and research tool. Until they released v2 which took away all the functionality and replaced it with a news feed.
[–] gcatalfamo 19 hours ago
And think that somebody designed it, and somebody else approved it.
[–] stingraycharles 1 day ago
Chrome was pretty great as well, it was desperately needed.
[–] nayuki 1 day ago
Google Chrome didn't start from scratch. Blink came from WebKit which came from KDE's KHTML. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink_(browser_engine) , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KHTML
[–] socalgal2 1 day ago
Entirely irrelevant - Chrome really stepped up both security and speed over WebKit at that time.
[–] nayuki 1 day ago
The comment you replied to was: "The only good products Google has ever built in-house are [...]"

I don't have enough information to judge how much of Chrome was original work and how much was pre-existing work. Though I guess by now, after nearly 20 years, Chrome's codebase looks absolutely nothing like KHTML.

[–] baq 22 hours ago
It was the rare confluence of people needing the same thing the megacorp showing them ads needed. We all benefited, no hard feelings, but always remember to look at where the puck is going.
[–] stingraycharles 18 hours ago
I blame how things turned out more on Mozilla being distracted and forgetting about their own user base, to be honest.
[–] baq 16 hours ago
The fact that it made the browser itself impossible to monetize to fund development was a part of it. They were an antitrust insurance to Google and tried lots of stuff to improve its position. Granted they failed, sometimes quite spectacularly, but I still drive Firefox for personal use.
[–] stingraycharles 14 hours ago
The money earned with Firefox should have gone to Firefox but went to vanity projects instead. Firefox OS, Mozilla Social, Firefox Send / Persona, acquiring Pocket, etc etc. And all of it failed.

Nevermind the controversies of silly ad campaigns and CEO salaries and whatnot.

Mozilla should have just reinvested all the money into Firefox. Heck, they couldn’t even finish their rust-based rendering engine.

[–] raisedbyninjas 1 day ago
Isn't Waymo the state of the art?
[–] aardvarkr 1 day ago
They’re still the same price as an uber and there’s no way to actually order one, it’s all random. I don’t understand why… like I actively would prefer them. If they were available so instead I find myself reaching for the cybercabs instead at half the price.
[–] nhod 1 day ago
Uh, use the Waymo app?
[–] diegolas 17 hours ago
HN is hilarious man lol half the world runs on the office suite and drive, at all levels
[–] miohtama 12 hours ago
Workspace was acquisition.

Google acquired it from Upstartle (the company behind the online word processor Writely).

Writely was created in 2005 by Claudia Carpenter, Steve Newman, and Sam Schillace. Google bought Upstartle in 2006 and Writely became the foundation of Google Docs. Google then combined it with other acquisitions, such as 2Web Technologies for spreadsheets, and launched Google Docs & Spreadsheets in October 2006.

[–] etse 18 hours ago
Calendar is my fav.
[–] antonvs 1 day ago
App Engine was good for its time, and I don't think that was an acquisition. Similarly, Cloud Storage and Google Cloud in general are pretty good products.

I started using AWS when EC2 and S3 first came out, but was forced to switch to Gcloud by the most recent company I joined. I was pleasantly surprised. In many ways it's more techie-focused than AWS, which is more enterprise-focused. And their managed Kubernetes is second to none.