points by jakozaur 1 day ago | 0 comments
I tested it, and it looks real but more nuanced. It is just for subagents; workflows do not seem affected. I guess many new users prefer workflows (ultracode), so the impact is less than the report suggested.
Moreover it is mostly cached reads, so subagents with short context cost little, while long-context ones cost much more.
In my Claude Code sessions, it looks more like ~8% at most.
[–] lemming 1 day ago
I mean… 8% still seems pretty indefensible, especially if you can’t turn it off. That’s a big chunk of usage.
[–] chii 23 hours ago
any % is indefensible, because this should be user toggled. It's an unnecessary money burner.
[–] simon83 19 hours ago