Hacker News
points by jakozaur 1 day ago | 0 comments
I tested it, and it looks real but more nuanced. It is just for subagents; workflows do not seem affected. I guess many new users prefer workflows (ultracode), so the impact is less than the report suggested.

Moreover it is mostly cached reads, so subagents with short context cost little, while long-context ones cost much more.

In my Claude Code sessions, it looks more like ~8% at most.

[–] simon83 19 hours ago
In my sessions it is ~16%, not using workflows due to the nature of my work (a lot of research subagents where fixed workflows don't work well)
[–] lemming 1 day ago
I mean… 8% still seems pretty indefensible, especially if you can’t turn it off. That’s a big chunk of usage.
[–] chii 23 hours ago
any % is indefensible, because this should be user toggled. It's an unnecessary money burner.