Hacker News

points by jpardoe 20 hours ago | 0 comments

It's crazy how different everyone's experience is. I'm running 3-6 concurrent sessions in work hours and Opus 5.5 feels practically unlimited on $200/month. The value is incredible for how much I'm outputting. I finally managed to exhaust a weekly budget doing huge refactors and letting it run through the night with many sub agents so I thought I would try OpenAI for the first time. Even using Terra for most of my sub agents I can't believe how quickly I'm burning through my weekly quota. It seems significantly less generous than my Claude sub and at least in my experience Opus 5.5 is also clearly superior.

[–] nikolay 12 hours ago

Running in parallel and the new "thread coordination" is even worse! I "love" the cryptic messages threads share, and the endless loops of "main has changed, so, all tests done got invalidated". Maybe I have the wrong workflow, but I doubt. Mostly it's harness regular updates.

[–] hnart 11 hours ago

opus does feel insanely great with consumption at this point I'll let it rip for a long time on "high effort" and it'll move the needle on the 7d by 1%

my main gripe at the moment is how they structure ultracode workflows which I tried again last week after a long hiatus. It created insanely complex milestones/lanes that moved super slow

btw, I always mix and match models/harnesses but since Opus 5.5 I'm finding fewer reasons to go with Codex/Grok/Kimi/others

I expect this will change again soon

[–] SmirkingRevenge 18 hours ago

Same here. I think the programming language and project size/complexity probably have a lot to do with it

The code I own professionally has LOC in the 6 figures, and it's near impossible to hit weekly quota unless I'm running a bunch of experiments on the side or using Fable for everything

Probably a different story when the codebase is much larger