points by _trampeltier 18 hours ago | 0 comments
So you can allways trust the carriers. So then it's maybe a feature.
[–] mzajc 18 hours ago
I trust mine not to brick my smartphone on purpose, at least. Especially not using methods that leave traces of what was done.
[–] rvba 18 hours ago
a bad actor can hack the carrier and brick the phones the same way the fridges were hacked and bricked few weeks ago
perhaps even a rogue employee
[–] t_mahmood 17 hours ago
If that happens, I think the actors will have more serious things to hack around then phone-looping some poor souls
[–] DaSHacka 15 hours ago
Why would you assume that? Being able to brick a substantial portion of citizen's devices would be of great value to many adversaries abroad.
[–] izacus 13 hours ago
They could just... take down the mobile network without having to go through the hassle of bricking your phone individually.
And it's not that hard, bring down a VPN or some core routing service.
[–] DaSHacka 8 hours ago
But that's temporary, and phones can roam to other carriers. Bricking large swaths of consumer devices is a much more permanent effect, especially for non-phones (think modern cars, PoS terminals, and other devices with SIMs)
[–] izacus 13 hours ago
The carrier? You mean the company that actually routes and controls the emergency calls and other calls this DDoSes? And routes and controls all your data transfer and owns the cell towers?
How do you make calls without trusting them?
[–] jeroenhd 18 hours ago