Hacker News
points by tallanvor 19 hours ago | 0 comments
It wasn't long ago that companies like Google were advocating for zero trust networks that avoid the need for VPNs!
[–] dewey 18 hours ago
But what they mean by that was that the application (Gitlab in this case) should be behind a IAP proxy (https://docs.cloud.google.com/iap/docs) or something, not that you just put it on the public internet. Also defined here in the zero trust docs (https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/framework/securit...).
[–] midtake 14 hours ago
Zero trust is more like you need strong authentication like FIDO on the webapp even if it's behind the VPN, not that you get rid of defense in depth.
[–] ifwinterco 16 hours ago
Zero trust ≠ publicly accessible.

And zero trust makes sense, once one service behind a VPN is compromised attackers can potentially move laterally, zero trust mitigates that

[–] theamk 17 hours ago
that works too

For personal services, even something as simple as HTTP basic auth on the webserver dramatically reduces the attack surface by blocking all probers and drive-by attacks.

Hacker News