Hacker News
points by jamiejquinn 13 hours ago | 0 comments
A license like GPL is very restrictive, but I wouldn't call it source available. Maybe I'm missing your point?
[–] loire280 10 hours ago
A well known example is Gitlab Enterprise - you can see the source code but (IANAL) you can't use it without paying them and any modifications you make become the property of Gitlab. I remember seeing similar terms around some of the proprietary Confluent Platform components.

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/LICENS...

[–] jamiejquinn 10 hours ago
Wow, that is very restrictive.
[–] loire280 9 hours ago
It's better than nothing when you are troubleshooting and suspect it's their bug. I hope the rampant illegal AI scraping doesn't force companies to end the practice and go completely closed-source.